Establishing Prejudice: Putting the Brakes on Spoliation Motions

In a very short opinion, Magistrate Judge Facciola showed a path to putting the brakes on spoliation motions: “Assessing whether sanctions are warranted for the loss of otherwise discoverable information is a function of whether a party has been prejudiced by that loss.”  Davis v. Grant Park Nursing Home, LP, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118853 at *3 (D.D.C. Nov. 9, 2010).  

Demonstrating prejudice is not new.  Judge Facciola discussed it in D’Onofrio v. SFX Sports Group, Inc., 06-cv-687, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86711, at *11 (D.D.C. Aug. 24, 2010).  As Judge Facciola explained:

Prejudice to a party can only be examined by looking at all the information that is available, for only in that context can the nature and extent of the loss suffered be accurately gauged.

Davis, at *3. 

The path to controlling the rush to file spoliation motions is when these motions should be filed.  In this case, the Court held that discussing sanctions was “premature” until the end of discoveryDavis, at *3-4. At that time, the Court could accurately determine if there had been any prejudice from the alleged destruction of electronically stored information.  Davis, at *4.

Bow Tie Thoughts

The failure to issue a litigation hold and the preservation of evidence are unquestionably important issues.  Courts seek the truth of a matter and if evidence has been destroyed, sanctions should rightly issued on the offending party.

Now for the big “however”: the question of sanctions is not a game.  The hint of a failure to issue a litigation hold is not reason to put a party in a stockade.  While it should put a party on alert, there must be prejudice before a call to arms for sanctions.  Moreover, the a court is best able to determine if a party has suffered prejudice is at the close of discovery, not the beginning or middle of it.

3 thoughts on “Establishing Prejudice: Putting the Brakes on Spoliation Motions

  1. Pingback: Unfiltered Orange | Weekly eDiscovery News Update - November 17, 2010 | Orange Legal Technologies

  2. Pingback: Weekly Top Story Digest - November 17, 2010 | ComplexDiscovery

  3. Pingback: The November 20th weekend “Top 20 … plus more” – a compendium of e-discovery articles and upcoming events | The Electronic Discovery Reading Room

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s